Nikon D5100 Review – Part 4

I just finished with the 4th part of the D5100 story.

Click here to get directly to page 4, or click here to get to the start of the D5100 review.

Covered topics:

  • Battery life
  • A quick rather technical approach to low light AF performance
  • A not so serious exercise to do continous shooting in low light to track cars

    ~Andy
Advertisements

Nikon D5100 Review – Part 3

Here comes the next part of this review.

(Click here if you would like to start from the beginning of the Nikon D5100 review)

This time I’ll share some images and experiences with the 2 kit lenses – the AFS 18-55 and AFS 18-105mm VR. The bigger share of this third part is spend around night photography, how well the D5100 handles overall low ISO situations. But it is also a good opportunity to demonstrate the limitations entry level bodies have versus their more expensive companions in the pro camp.

~Andy

Nikon D5100 Review – Part 2

Hi out there,

I did add the next page to my Nikon D5100 review journey.

Covered topics today:

  1. Images of planes in flight with the AFS 55-300mm VR
  2. Some quick remarks about the performance of the AFS 18-200mm VR
  3. A night “shootout” between 7 different bodies. 52 high resolution ISO images to download for personal comparison. (D5100, D50, D90, D3100, D5000, D7000 and D3S)
    As allways, I welcome your remarks and comments.

enjoy, Andy

Review Nikon D5100

I’ve been quite inactive on my blog for the last 2 months – apologies, but other duties had a higher priority.

Yesterday, my Nikon D5100 arrived. Like with the D7000 impressions posted in january, I’d like to share some of my initial impressions with the D5100 during the coming days.

The first day summary with the Nikon D5100 can be found here.

Let me know, if you find this useful,

~Andy

Focus issues with fast lenses: Status = solved.

Due to other obligations, I hadn’t updated my blog for a while. Before I start with other stories I’d like to share, I thought to sum up the old story of the fast lenses I started in january.

About 3 months ago, I had this bad experience with the D7000 and the 3 new fast prime lenses (AFS 24mm/1.4, AFS 35mm/1.4 and AFS 85mm/1.4). Images were really bad, when shot wide open. Trying to narrow down the root causes, unfortunately other bodies displayed the same behavior as the D7000. Looked like, it was a bigger issue.

To cut a long story short, after 2 visits at the Nikon Service Point, the problem is now solved. The worst combination I had, was the D7000 with the AFS 24mm/1.4. Blurred images independent of aperture, distance and focus accuracy.

During the second visit, all 3 bodies (D7000, D3X and D3s) and all 3 lenses were adjusted properly. One could argue, that Nikon should have shipped perfect producst from the beginning. My answer to this is :Yes and No. Yes, it would be great to see all components in the image pipeline like AF accuracy, tolerances to progress as well. No, as complex systems are hard to come by, and usually, customers and suppliers are intertwined in their desire to solve issues.

Anyway, after the adjustement, there is no need for any AF finetuning and the lenses and bodies are smoothly working together with very pleasant results.

Thanks Nikon,

~Andy